Saturday, August 7, 2021
I had a fantastic night's sleep. I think it was because someone spoke to me with affection. I think I'm a pretty easy friend/companion/family member. On the other hand, when I feel raw edges between another person and myself because of unresolved issues, I can be pretty miserable. I don't need everything to be 'my way,' in the usual sense of the term. However, I need reconciliation, clearing the air, so everyone is comfortable with the outcome. I always go back to cocreating. Of course, I do demand that communication style, so it's not entirely true that I don't want more than others want to give. If others don't want to engage in negotiation, it's a no-exit situation.
I am told that negotiation is the favored solution to personal differences in our modern society. That's what's advocated by psychologists these days. Then again, Yvette and I had one who deliberately blocked discussion. She interjected her judgments and shut down all discussions between Yvette and me. Very weird.
Discussion is of value in any situation where people are too far apart in their values. Can these differences be resolved without words? I know they can; a defining story of my relationship with Mike was a difference we resolved without words. I've told it before, probably more than once. We went to Fortunoff's to buy a stainless-steel cutlery set. We went our separate ways without talking to check out the available patterns. I picked out something very modern; he picked out something my great-grandparents would have liked. We met up with our selections. We looked at each other's choices and returned to the display without saying a word.
We rendezvoused again with our new selections. His was more modern and mine more traditional. Again, without saying a word, we went back to the display. On this last run, Mike picked a winner, one we both liked, not just one we both could live with. I like the pattern to this day, as did he. This became the story of our relationship. It's the dialectic; the synthesis is better than either thesis or the antithesis. I try to live by this code. Modifying myself to suit someone else's needs presents exciting opportunities for me to change and grow. Does it also present burdens? Of course. When doesn't life present burdens? I get burdened with my life. I get sick and tired of eating the food I cook, even though I have a good variety. It's still always and forever me. I get sick and tired of the sameness.
I worked on automatic processing with adolescent D. I used the same 2nd-grade level material I had with sixth-grade D. I instructed the student to wait to see what information his mind provided. There are three options: the correct word, the wrong word, or nothing. All three provide valuable information. He made some sound substitutions that suggested that there was still disturbance in his auditory processing center. I asked him if the work we did previously held. He said, "Yes." We did a release a while ago that made speech comprehension easier. He said that before we did that work, speech sounds were compressed. I sensed some small piece still left.
I asked him if he would try the work I was proposing. I told him if I were wrong, nothing would happen. He cooperated. The small piece expanded to something much larger as we did the release. I told him to imagine hearing a child crying on a roller coaster. I don't use this image with all students. I asked if hearing the crying was relaxing or stressful. He said neither. If he had said stressful, I would have told him to stop. I believe the direction of the work should always be toward greater relaxation. Using this measure assures that no harm can come from the work. The image of him 'drowning' and calling for his mom came to mind. It didn't look like he was drowning in water. He could have been drowning in confusion or too much stimulus. Whatever it was, I don't think his mom picked up on what was happening. I told him she didn't do something terrible. She missed understanding his upset; he will do it to his kids too. No one can understand another person perfectly, even if it is our very own child. Also, if a kid freaks out, making light of it is one way to help them regain balance. If they see their parent laughing, they can get that there is no problem and calm down. Either way, he had to release this lesson.
Life delivers lessons we must remember forever, and it delivers some that we should forget. We should always remember that fire is hot, and we can get burnt. Sometimes we are injured in a unique situation that is unlikely to reoccur. A woman told me the story of how she was standing on an NYC street corner when a car went out of control and hit her. What are the chances of that ever happening again? However, she never stood at a curb without that warning clearly in mind. She had PTSD, a learned response that is more dysfunctional than helpful.
Earlier this week, I sent notes on the audio file to Tommy so he could complete the editing. It felt like it must have been over a week. When I reread the updates, I saw it was just a few days ago. I have been complaining about temporal disorientation. I have been concerned that it has something to do with my age, but I have learned that many people are suffering the same fate. I texted Tommy today to ask if he could successfully render the audio file in its original form, without visual fuzziness or the audio out of sync with the visual. He called me back. He said he had done most of it and would be successful. I was worried when I didn't hear from him that the problem with the video was irreparable.
Yvette came up in the late afternoon to get an update on how my hip was doing. We had a pleasant visit. I brought up the topic of our electric usage. I installed a good-sized solar system with Tesla batteries. Right after I did, we entered a period of daily overcast skies and rain. We were on the grid for a good part of the 24 hours. One of my walking buddies told me he only used 15 kwh daily. It was just him and his son, and they didn't have solar hot water; we do. We use more like 50 kwh a day. I thought it might be my fridge. It's large for a domestic model. I calculated it uses three kwh a day. Let's say all three refrigerators on the property each use three kwh a day; that's nine kwh right there. We are using something like 40 kwh a day. I told her I wanted to check that some neighborhood meth lab hadn't tapped into our line. Mind you, I'm not paying for electricity anymore. My share has been covered forever- with the solar installation. However, I don't like not understanding what is going on. Of course, if I didn't check the Tesla app every two minutes, I wouldn't know something was happening. After all, none of this is my problem anymore.
A friend recently talked about aspects that make me "different." I asked, "I'm different. What about so-and-so, and so-and-so?" Yes, they're different, but they keep to themselves. I'm extroverted and different. Ah! I find the information interesting. I anticipate being sculpted by this new information. Who will I become? I will always be myself. As I see it, I have no choice but always to be myself. No matter what role I assume, I can only be myself in that role. I can transform as Cate Blanchett or Meryl Streep are in their roles, but they too can only be themselves. Their fingerprint is inextinguishable.
I'm not different from others. It's not that I 'allow' myself to be transformed and others don't. No, as I see it, I acknowledge the impact of others on me while some don't. They say they fight against the pressure of others to change. Yes, but they are sculpting themselves in the process of this resistance. We are formed in the context of others. Is there a base? Apparently, as seen in separated-twin studies. But what creates that commonality? It might be genetics. Here's another option. Twins are bound together. Their nervous systems are synchronized in utero. The more they have in common to start, identical versus fraternal, the more easily they synchronize. The separation does not break that bond any more than the separation of birthmother and infant is broken by separation. Does that mean other relationships cannot become as important, if not more so? No. It means it is a factor, like a small splinter, barely noticeable but affecting every move we make.
Today was August's eighteenth birthday. Last year, Jean and I sang happy birthday to him tougher on a conference call. I called Jean to ask if she wanted to do that again. Then I texted August to tell me when he was up. I also texted Damon and Cylin to make sure he let me know. Damon texted that August had a sleepover at a friend's and wasn't even home.
Unbelievably, August texted me back with minutes. I called him and then arranged the conference call with Jean. Jean, John, and I all sang a traditional version of the song, and then I did the famous "Ross" version, which Mike and I developed to compensate for his total inability to carry a tune. I told August he should consider coming out to Hawaii with friends without his parents. He just had to remember I didn't cook. He said, "There's always Costco pizza." I hope they do better by me than that.
August is heading off to college in a few weeks. He received notification aboutf his roommate. The boy is from Boston and went to some private university school. Damon called one of his best friends from Vassar, who lives in Boston, to tell him the boy was from there and went to that school. Jud produced the name. The boy is the older brother of Jud's daughter's best friend. Is this pretty amazing or expected?
I spent the day writing, but only on my updates. I'd been avoiding working on a revised version of my article on my reading method. Oh, well, pretty depressing.
______-______-______
Musings:
In today's TED talk, the subject was how people reconcile differences. These differences are any two points of view: two people in a marriage or two nations.
He said the conventional approach is to find common ground. He calls it a dumbing down because both people are reduced to a small aspect of themselves to accommodate the other. The other aspect of this approach is forgiveness. Sometimes unpleasant things happen, you forgive- that's it. Each incident is considered an isolated moment, not to be seen in relation to other moments, not as part of a pattern.
He said the alternative way, which the speaker had never considered before, is you create a new option. Huh? I don't know when I realized that's the way I wanted to go. That's the only way that's acceptable to me. He said that two people create something new, a third thing, their relationship. It is the only option for me. I guess I was raised on a heavy diet of the dialectic: thesis, antithesis, and synthesis – the third thing.
Of course, my insistence on using this approach makes me as stubborn as those who insist on doing it the 'other way.' I remember people in the commune arguing that they either got along or didn't. Of course, these people remained unmarried or were repeatedly married. Either way, they were unsuccessful in intimate relationships.
However, I have seen a marriage that uses system number one. It survives because the system for resolving differences does not involve negotiation, arriving at a mutually created third option neither considered. The method depends on one party always getting their way unless the other has a strong objection. In that case, it goes the other way. There is no third way. Now that can't be accurate. There is no way their ways of doing things aren't somewhat different from what they originally wanted. It may be considered a compromise, a less-than solution. The solution is always a "more-than" approach with the dialectic approach. It's a surprise. It is something neither of you thought of before—such an adventure.